The Multilateral Instrument and International Taxation
The Multilateral Convention represents one of the most significant international tax developments in modern history. Introduced under the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project, the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) aims to swiftly and efficiently update existing bilateral tax treaties to reflect the new global standards on transparency, anti-avoidance, and dispute resolution—without requiring individual renegotiation of each treaty.
Before the MLI, more than 3,000 bilateral tax treaties governed cross-border taxation, many of which were outdated and lacked safeguards against double non-taxation, treaty shopping, and artificial profit shifting. The MLI provides a unified legal instrument to amend these treaties simultaneously, enhancing coherence, consistency, and fairness across jurisdictions.
The Purpose and Scope of the MLI
The MLI was developed as Action 15 of the BEPS Project and entered into force on 1 July 2018. Its main purpose is to modify existing double tax agreements (DTAs) to implement the tax treaty-related measures arising from the BEPS Action Plan, specifically those addressing:
Hybrid mismatches (Action 2) aim to prevent double deductions or deduction/non-inclusion outcomes. Treaty abuse (Action 6) focuses on eliminating opportunities for treaty shopping and inappropriate benefits. Artificial avoidance of permanent establishment (PE) status (Action 7) works to prevent businesses from fragmenting operations in order to escape taxation. Improving dispute resolution (Action 14) ensures the timely and effective resolution of tax disputes through mutual agreement procedures (MAPs).
By ratifying the MLI, a jurisdiction effectively opts in or out of certain provisions (known as “reservations” and “notifications”) that define how the MLI modifies its existing treaties with other signatories.
Mechanism of Application
The MLI operates through a matching mechanism, meaning it only modifies provisions where both treaty partners have made compatible elections. This ensures flexibility for sovereign states while maintaining legal clarity.
Covered Tax Agreements (CTAs) refer to treaties that are mutually listed by both jurisdictions, making them “covered” under the MLI. Each provision of the MLI interacts with existing treaty language through compatibility clauses, which may involve “replacement,” “modification,” or “addition” clauses. The entry into effect of the MLI varies depending on the ratification, deposit, and notification dates of each jurisdiction, often leading to staggered application across different treaties.
For example, if Country A and Country B have both ratified the MLI, and each has listed their DTA with the other as a CTA, the modifications take effect from the later of the two jurisdictions’ dates of ratification and notification.
Key Articles and Their Practical Impact
The MLI introduces several important measures to address issues in international taxation. Articles 6 and 7 focus on the prevention of treaty abuse, establishing a Principal Purpose Test (PPT) as the minimum standard to combat treaty abuse. This test denies treaty benefits when obtaining those benefits was one of the principal purposes of an arrangement, unless granting them aligns with the treaty’s object and purpose. Some jurisdictions also adopt a Limitation on Benefits (LOB) clause or a combined PPT-LOB approach for added rigor.
Articles 12 to 15 address the avoidance of permanent establishment (PE) status, targeting structures where companies avoided creating a taxable presence through dependent agents, commissionaire arrangements, or artificially splitting contracts. The new definitions of PE expand the scope of what constitutes a taxable business presence, particularly for construction and service projects. Articles 16 to 19 aim to improve dispute resolution by strengthening the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) framework, requiring good-faith resolution of disputes and, in some cases, mandatory binding arbitration. This enhances certainty for multinational enterprises facing double taxation. Finally, Articles 3 to 5 address hybrid mismatches and transparent entities by clarifying the tax treatment of hybrid entities and dual-resident companies, ensuring income is taxed once rather than being doubly deducted or excluded.
Global Adoption and Implementation
As of 2025, over 100 jurisdictions have signed the MLI, and more than 2,000 treaties are already modified or expected to be modified. Countries like the United Kingdom, Canada, India, and France have widely implemented the MLI, while others, including the United States, have opted not to sign, preferring bilateral negotiations.
For developing economies, especially in Africa and Asia, the MLI represents a crucial tool to align with international norms without the administrative burden of renegotiating multiple treaties.
Future Outlook
The MLI has proven that multilateral reform is feasible in international tax law, traditionally one of the most bilateral areas of public international cooperation. The OECD’s ongoing BEPS 2.0 initiatives—particularly the Pillar One and Pillar Two frameworks on digital taxation and minimum global tax—will likely rely on a similar multilateral approach.
Over time, as more countries ratify and align their treaty networks, the MLI’s harmonizing effect will become more pronounced, reducing opportunities for tax base erosion while ensuring fair taxation where economic value is created.
Conclusion
The MLI stands as a landmark in international tax cooperation, combining speed, flexibility, and legal precision. While its implementation poses challenges, it remains the most effective instrument to modernize global tax treaties in a coordinated and consistent manner. For multinational enterprises, understanding the MLI’s impact on treaty benefits, permanent establishment risks, and dispute resolution procedures is now essential for managing cross-border tax exposure in an increasingly complex world.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) in international taxation?
+
The MLI is a legal tool developed under the OECD/G20 BEPS Project to swiftly update existing bilateral tax treaties. It introduces modern rules on transparency, anti-avoidance, and dispute resolution without requiring each treaty to be renegotiated separately.
Why was the MLI introduced?
+
Before the MLI, over 3,000 bilateral tax treaties were in place, many outdated and vulnerable to treaty abuse, double non-taxation, and profit shifting. The MLI modernizes these treaties to close loopholes and align them with international tax standards.
When did the MLI enter into force?
+
The MLI entered into force on 1 July 2018 as part of Action 15 of the BEPS Project.
What are the main issues addressed by the MLI?
+
The MLI modifies treaties to address:
• Hybrid mismatches (Action 2)
• Treaty abuse (Action 6)
• Artificial avoidance of permanent establishment (Action 7)
• Improving dispute resolution (Action 14)
How does the MLI apply to existing tax treaties?
+
It uses a matching mechanism. Provisions apply only when both treaty partners make compatible elections. The treaties listed by both countries are called Covered Tax Agreements (CTAs).
What is the Principal Purpose Test (PPT) under the MLI?
+
The PPT denies tax treaty benefits if one of the main purposes of a transaction or arrangement was to obtain those benefits, unless doing so aligns with the treaty’s overall purpose.
How does the MLI affect permanent establishment (PE) rules?
+
The MLI broadens the definition of a PE to capture arrangements like commissionaire structures, contract splitting, or dependent agents, ensuring companies can’t avoid taxable presence artificially.
What improvements does the MLI bring to dispute resolution?
+
The MLI strengthens the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP), ensuring disputes are resolved in good faith. Some countries also accept mandatory binding arbitration, giving multinationals greater certainty.
How many countries have signed and implemented the MLI?
+
As of 2025, over 100 jurisdictions have signed the MLI, and more than 2,000 treaties have been or are expected to be modified. Major economies like the UK, India, France, and Canada are signatories, while the US has not signed.
What is the future outlook of the MLI in international tax law?
+
The MLI has shown multilateral reform is possible in tax law. Future initiatives like the OECD’s BEPS 2.0 Pillar One and Pillar Two (digital taxation and global minimum tax) are expected to follow similar multilateral approaches.
To find out more, please fill out the form or email us at: info@eg.Andersen.com
Contact Us
