Valuing Cyclical Companies: Key Techniques and Metrics
Companies with cyclical revenue streams pose unique challenges in valuation. Cyclical companies—often in industries like energy, automotive, retail, and commodities—experience revenue and profit fluctuations aligned with economic cycles, customer demand patterns, and sector-specific conditions. Valuing these companies requires techniques that capture these cyclic fluctuations, providing a more accurate assessment of both upside potential and downside risk.
This article delves into the essentials of valuing cyclical companies, emphasizing the techniques and metrics most appropriate for companies with variable revenue streams.
Understanding Cyclicality and Its Impact on Valuation
Cyclical companies are sensitive to economic cycles and broader industry trends. Unlike stable businesses, they tend to experience significant revenue variations, often with peak revenues during economic upturns and lower revenues during downturns. This cyclicality affects both cash flows and profit margins, making it difficult to apply traditional valuation models directly. For instance, the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio can be misleading if calculated during an upcycle, while discounted cash flow (DCF) models may inaccurately reflect potential downturns if only peak years are projected.
To capture this variability accurately, it’s essential to understand the specific cycle drivers for the industry. Is it largely tied to consumer demand, as in retail or automotive? Or is it driven by external factors, such as commodity prices in the mining or oil sectors? Knowing these factors allows for a more nuanced approach to valuation that better aligns with the company’s risk profile and revenue behavior.
Key Valuation Techniques for Cyclical Companies
Several techniques are particularly useful for valuing companies with cyclical revenue streams. These methods adapt traditional valuation frameworks to account for cyclicality, thereby providing a more balanced and robust approach.
1. Normalized Earnings Approach
The normalized earnings approach smooths out fluctuations by calculating an average of earnings across multiple years, covering both peak and trough phases of the cycle. This gives a more stable measure of profitability, mitigating the effects of high revenue periods that may not be sustainable.
To apply this approach, analysts may calculate average earnings over an entire cycle or select a reasonable historical period that reflects the business cycle. For example, a homebuilder might use five years of earnings to account for typical real estate cycles, avoiding distortions from unusually strong or weak years.
By using normalized earnings in valuation ratios (like P/E or EV/EBITDA), investors can better assess whether a cyclical company’s valuation aligns with its long-term profitability rather than short-term peaks or troughs.
2. Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) Ratio
Popularized by economist Robert Shiller, the CAPE ratio is calculated by dividing the company’s price by its average inflation-adjusted earnings over a ten-year period. For cyclical companies, this approach can provide a more grounded sense of value by smoothing earnings across multiple business cycles.
The CAPE ratio is particularly valuable in industries with long business cycles, like mining and heavy manufacturing. It minimizes the risk of overvaluation during a peak or undervaluation during a downturn by averaging earnings over a long enough period to account for cyclic fluctuations.
3. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) with Scenario Analysis
The traditional DCF model can be adapted to account for cyclicality by incorporating different scenarios for future cash flows. In this approach, analysts build multiple cash flow projections based on likely market conditions, such as a boom scenario, a base scenario, and a recession scenario.
By assigning probabilities to each scenario, analysts can calculate a weighted average of these potential outcomes, capturing the company’s earnings under various market conditions. For a cyclical company like an oil producer, for example, the cash flows would vary significantly depending on future oil prices, so different price scenarios help account for this variability.
Although DCF models inherently involve forecasting, scenario analysis can help mitigate some risks of over-optimism during an upcycle or undue pessimism during a downturn.
4. Relative Valuation with Peer Benchmarking
Comparing a cyclical company’s valuation to that of similar companies in the same industry provides additional context. This is often done using valuation multiples, such as EV/EBITDA or EV/Revenue. Since cyclicality affects the entire sector, peer comparisons can help normalize valuation estimates and identify overvalued or undervalued companies relative to industry standards.
For instance, an auto manufacturer might seem undervalued in isolation but, when compared with other auto companies, might simply be reflecting industry-wide downturns. By using peer benchmarks, investors can avoid mistaking cyclical effects for company-specific undervaluation or overvaluation.
Additional Factors to Consider in Cyclical Valuation
While valuation techniques provide the framework, several additional factors are crucial for accurate assessments of cyclical companies:
- 1. Economic Indicators and Cycle Timing
Understanding where the economy stands within a cycle is essential when valuing cyclical companies. Analyzing leading indicators, such as interest rates, GDP growth, and consumer sentiment, can help gauge the potential for an upturn or downturn. Cyclical companies often experience volatile price swings depending on these indicators, and recognizing the current phase of the cycle can help predict the trajectory of revenues and valuations.
2. Company-Specific Resilience
Not all companies respond equally to cycles, even within the same industry. Some cyclical companies have diversified product lines, stable revenue sources, or better cash reserves, helping them weather downturns. Companies with strong cost control or operational flexibility may have a competitive advantage during challenging periods.
For instance, a steel manufacturer with a diversified product mix across multiple sectors may be less affected by a downturn in construction demand. Assessing a company’s resilience allows investors to determine how well it can sustain value over multiple cycles, which impacts its valuation stability.
3. Debt Levels and Interest Sensitivity
Cyclical companies often take on high levels of debt to finance expansion during growth phases. However, high debt can be a burden during downturns, leading to increased financial risk. Evaluating a company’s debt structure and its exposure to interest rate changes is crucial for cyclical companies, particularly during recessionary periods when cash flow may be tight.
4. Long-Term Growth Prospects
For cyclical companies, long-term growth prospects provide insights into whether the company is likely to improve its standing over multiple cycles. For example, an energy company investing in renewable resources may have better long-term prospects than one reliant on fossil fuels, even though both may be in the same sector.
Practical Example: Valuing a Cyclical Company in the Retail Sector
To illustrate, consider a retailer with high seasonal and economic sensitivity, such as a department store chain. Here’s a step-by-step application of the above approaches:
- 1. Normalize Earnings
Average the company’s earnings over five years to smooth out fluctuations caused by holiday peaks and economic downturns. By using normalized earnings, investors avoid placing too much weight on exceptionally good or poor years.
2. CAPE Ratio
Calculate the CAPE ratio by averaging the company’s inflation-adjusted earnings over a longer period, such as ten years. This captures the ups and downs in consumer spending, aligning the valuation with the broader economic cycle.
3. Scenario-Based DCF
Create three cash flow scenarios:
- Boom Scenario: Assume a strong economy, where consumer spending is high, leading to increased revenue.
- Base Scenario: Assume steady, average economic conditions.
- Recession Scenario: Assume decreased consumer spending due to an economic downturn, reducing cash flows.
Weight each scenario based on the likelihood of occurrence and calculate the average DCF value. This approach ensures that the valuation isn’t overly dependent on just one possible future.
4. Relative Valuation
Compare the retailer’s valuation metrics to similar companies in the retail sector. If the company’s EV/Revenue or P/E ratio is significantly different from peers, investigate whether it’s due to cyclical timing or a unique company-specific factor.
Conclusion
Valuing companies with cyclical revenue streams requires techniques that go beyond standard models. By adjusting for cyclicality through normalized earnings, CAPE ratios, scenario-based DCF, and peer benchmarking, investors can derive more accurate valuations that account for the inevitable ups and downs of the business cycle. Additionally, understanding the economic environment, assessing company-specific resilience, and analyzing debt levels are vital in building a well-rounded valuation approach for cyclical companies.
With these methods, investors can gain deeper insights into the true value of cyclical companies, making better-informed investment decisions that account for both market potential and inherent risks.
To find out more, please fill out the form or email us at: info@eg.Andersen.com
Contact Us
