Court Protects Buyer Rights in Real Estate Case in Egypt
In a landmark real estate case in Egypt, the court ordered Palm Hills Middle East to pay substantial compensation to a buyer after finding that the company had breached its contractual obligations and sold the contracted unit to another purchaser, reflecting the Egyptian judiciary’s approach to protecting buyers’ contractual rights in property developments.
The facts of the case date back to a contract concluded by a client to purchase a residential unit in a tourist project located on the North Coast and developed by Palm Hills Middle East. Under the sale agreement, the company undertook to deliver the unit on a specified date. However, the company failed to fulfill this fundamental obligation, which resulted in a legal dispute between the parties.
During the proceedings, the developer argued that the purchaser had failed to pay the instalments due on the agreed dates and therefore requested the termination of the sale agreement on that basis. The court, however, rejected this argument, confirming in its reasoning that the buyer’s refusal to pay the instalments in such circumstances constitutes a legitimate exercise of what is legally known as the right of retention (right to withhold performance).
The court explained that the buyer is entitled to refrain from paying instalments so long as the seller has not fulfilled its corresponding obligation to deliver the unit on the agreed date. This principle is well established in civil law and is based on maintaining balance between the contractual obligations of both parties.
The case documents also revealed that the company not only failed to deliver the unit but went further and sold the same unit that was the subject of the contract to another buyer, which the court considered a serious contractual breach and a clear violation of the principle of good faith in the performance of contractual obligations.
In light of these circumstances, the court concluded that Palm Hills Middle East must compensate the buyer in the amount of EGP 10 million for the damages he suffered as a result of the company’s failure to perform its contractual obligations and its failure to deliver the unit on the agreed date.
Commenting on the ruling, Maher Milad Iskander, the buyer’s attorney, stated that the judgment represents an important affirmation of the Egyptian judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights of purchasers in real estate projects. He noted that the court applied well-established legal principles confirming that a party who breaches its contractual obligations cannot rely on the alleged breach of the other party.
He further added that the ruling sends a clear message to the real estate development market that compliance with contractual commitments and respect for buyers’ rights is not optional but a legal obligation, the breach of which entails liability and significant compensation.
This judgment is considered one of the important rulings that reaffirm that the Egyptian judiciary firmly supports the protection of contractual stability in real estate transactions and represents a significant precedent that enhances the confidence of investors and purchasers in resorting to the courts to protect their rights.
Conclusion
This judgment once again confirms that the Egyptian judiciary places the protection of contractual rights at the forefront of its priorities, particularly in the real estate development sector, which has witnessed significant expansion in recent years. The ruling also sends a clear message to real estate companies that strict compliance with contractual terms and respect for buyers’ rights are essential, as any breach of such obligations may result in legal liability and substantial compensation. Moreover, this decision reinforces the confidence of market participants in the real estate sector by affirming that the judiciary remains a genuine safeguard for protecting their rights and addressing any violations that may occur in the performance of contractual obligations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did a court in Egypt award EGP 10M to a buyer?
+
A court in Egypt awarded compensation after determining that the developer breached its contractual obligations
by failing to deliver the residential unit on the agreed date and by selling the same unit to another buyer.
The court considered this conduct a serious contractual violation that caused financial harm to the purchaser.
Can a buyer withhold instalments if a unit is not delivered?
+
Yes. The court confirmed that a buyer may legally withhold instalment payments if the seller fails to fulfill
a fundamental contractual obligation, such as delivering the property on the agreed date. This principle is
known in civil law as the right of retention and helps maintain balance between contractual obligations.
What is the right to withhold payment in property contracts?
+
The right to withhold payment allows one party to suspend performance of its obligations when the other party
has not fulfilled its own contractual duties. In real estate transactions, this often arises when a developer
fails to deliver a property as agreed, giving the buyer the legal right to pause payments.
Why is selling the same property unit twice a legal breach?
+
Selling the same property unit to more than one buyer violates the contractual rights of the original purchaser
and breaches the principle of good faith in contract performance. Courts generally treat this conduct as a
serious contractual violation that may result in significant financial liability.
How do courts in Egypt protect buyer rights in property deals?
+
Courts in Egypt rely on established civil law principles that require parties to respect contractual obligations
and act in good faith. When developers fail to deliver property or breach contractual terms, courts may order
compensation to protect the buyer’s financial and legal interests.
What does this ruling mean for developers in Egypt?
+
The ruling sends a clear message that developers must strictly comply with contractual commitments. Failure to
deliver units on time or violating buyer rights can lead to legal disputes, financial penalties, and substantial
compensation awards ordered by the courts.
To find out more, please fill out the form or email us at: info@eg.Andersen.com
Contact Us
