Legal Framework Behind the Grand Egyptian Museum

The inauguration of the Grand Egyptian Museum (GEM) in November 2025 is not merely a cultural or touristic event; from a legal standpoint, it represents the direct implementation of a supreme constitutional principle concerning sovereignty over national heritage.

Article (50) of the Egyptian Constitution explicitly states:

“Egypt’s civilizational and cultural heritage, whether material or immaterial, in all its diversity and major phases—ancient Egyptian, Coptic, Islamic, and modern—is a national and human treasure. The State is committed to preserving and safeguarding it, and any assault upon it or trafficking in it is a crime not subject to prescription.”

Through this unequivocal constitutional provision, heritage ascends to the rank of public property enjoying direct constitutional protection. The duty to safeguard this heritage thus becomes a legal obligation borne by the State, not merely a cultural or moral responsibility.

Accordingly, the Grand Egyptian Museum should not be viewed as an administrative or engineering project, but as a sovereign institution established to embody the State’s constitutional commitment to protecting the national memory.

Legal Foundation

The museum was established under Presidential Decree No. 282 of 2002, which created a public authority named the National Authority for the Grand Egyptian Museum. It is affiliated with the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities and enjoys legal personality, as well as financial and administrative independence.

The decree authorized the Authority to:

• Establish, operate, and manage the museum as a national public facility.
• Conclude agreements with local and foreign entities.
• Administer grants and loans allocated to the project.
• Take necessary measures to protect artifacts transferred to the museum.

This decree positioned the museum among national authorities of a special nature—a legal category that lies between a “general authority” and an “economic authority.” It operates under the principles of public law but is administered according to private law mechanisms to ensure flexibility and efficiency.

Thus, the museum acquired an independent legal personality, enabling it to enter into contracts, assume obligations, collect fees, and litigate in its own name, while remaining subject to subsequent oversight by the Cabinet and the Central Auditing Organization.

Legislative Framework for Protecting Artifacts

The museum’s archaeological holdings are governed by Law No. 117 of 1983 (Antiquities Protection Law) and its amendments, whose Article (6) stipulates:

“All movable and immovable antiquities are the property of the State and may not be owned, disposed of, or seized.”

Accordingly, the museum does not own the artifacts in a legal sense; rather, it holds them in trust on behalf of the State as a “custodian of cultural public property,” subject to the supervision of the Administrative Prosecution Authority and the Supreme Council of Antiquities.

Furthermore, Egypt is internationally bound by:

• The 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export, and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.
• The 1972 Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.

The Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities has declared, through its regulatory decisions, that the GEM is a “national reference institution” for the implementation of both conventions, granting it a special international standing within the global heritage protection framework.

Administrative and Financial System

Legally, the Grand Egyptian Museum operates under the principle of “legal dualism in public facilities”, whereby:

• Its core infrastructure, security, and operations are managed under public law, as it is a public facility that cannot be closed or privatized.
• Meanwhile, its commercial services—such as shops, cafés, and recreational areas—are governed by private law through short-term investment contracts.

Its financial regulations adopt a dual funding model, combining:

• Annual government appropriations from the State’s general budget.
• Self-generated revenues from activities and services, in accordance with Article (20) of the Public Budget Law No. 6 of 2022.

This model ensures the economic sustainability of public facilities without compromising their public ownership, representing one of the modern trends in Egyptian administrative law.

Cultural Jurisdiction and Legal Sovereignty over Heritage

The Grand Egyptian Museum embodies the concept of “cultural jurisdiction of the State,” which asserts that sovereignty is exercised not only over land and resources but also over memory, history, and symbols.

Thus, heritage management is not purely a cultural endeavor—it is an expression of legal sovereignty in the symbolic and intangible realm.

The museum’s official inauguration by presidential decree and under the auspices of the Presidency constitutes a practical exercise of sovereignty, just as the State exercises sovereignty in geographic or military domains.

In this context, the protection of the museum’s collections is a sovereign duty not subject to prescription, in accordance with Article (50), which classifies offenses against heritage or its illicit trade as perpetual crimes. This rare legislative exception reflects the legislator’s intent to grant eternal protection to this category of public property.

Jurisprudential Analysis

In comparative administrative jurisprudence, the Grand Egyptian Museum is categorized as a public establishment of mixed character (Établissement public à caractère mixte)—combining the provision of a public service with the pursuit of economic activity.

It remains under State authority in terms of establishment and supervision, yet enjoys functional independence, enabling it to contract freely and manage its own operations.

This legal model reflects the evolution of Egypt’s administrative philosophy from the notion of “tutelage” (la tutelle administrative) to that of “empowerment”, granting cultural institutions operational autonomy while preserving the State’s overarching legal oversight.

Conclusion

At its core, the Grand Egyptian Museum represents a legislative embodiment of Article (50) of the Constitution and a practical manifestation of the principle that the protection of heritage is not merely a cultural or social obligation but a constitutional and sovereign duty.

It stands as a living model of the Egyptian State’s ability to transform constitutional principles into tangible institutions where public and private law intersect, and where culture is governed by precise legal organization.

Thus, the Grand Egyptian Museum is not merely the “Home of Egyptian Antiquities,” but also the “Home of Egyptian Law”—a place where texts meet stones, sovereignty meets memory, and the Constitution meets civilization.

Frequently Asked Questions

To find out more, please fill out the form or email us at: info@eg.Andersen.com

Contact Us